 |
|
| Blog results | Results 1 - 7 of about 8 for ("learned society" OR "learned societies") AND ("good works" OR angels) blogurl:http://openaccess.eprints.org/. (0.13 seconds) |
| Sorted by relevance Sort by date |
| 1 Apr 2007 by (Stevan Harnad) SUMMARY: The formula for distinguishing which of the scholarly and scientific societies are on the side of the angels will be simple to reckon. By Their Works Shall Ye Know Them: The societies that are Green on author self-archiving -- and are not lobbying against Green OA ... And for good measure (and backup) the distributed and mirrored IR contents can be harvested into various Central Repositories (CRs), including learned society repositories, if they wish. ... Open Access Archivangelism - http://openaccess.eprints.org/ - References |
| 21 Feb 2007 by (Stevan Harnad) (4) "Mandating self-archiving will destroy Learned Societies' other 'good works'": The research community was never consulted, and never agreed to subsidise Learned Societies' other 'good works' from researchers' own lost access and impact. Those 'good works' (publicity, meetings, scholarships, mentoring, etc.), will need to find other forms of support if/when Learned Society publishing revenue surpluses no longer cover them (at the expense of research access and impact). ... Open Access Archivangelism - http://openaccess.eprints.org/ - References |
| 21 Aug 2005 by harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Stevan Harnad) But entirely apart from that, ALPSP certainly has no grounds for asking researchers to renounce maximising their own research impact for the sake of financing learned societies' good works (like meetings, bursaries and public education) ... Open Access Archivangelism - http://openaccess.eprints.org/ |
| 20 Sep 2007 by (Stevan Harnad) (This time, it will look at how hypothetical lost subscriptions will affect Learned Societies' "good works," such as the funding they provide for conferences and scholarships, and -- a new one! -- the funding they provide for research!) ... Open Access Archivangelism - http://openaccess.eprints.org/ |
| 21 Aug 2005 by harnad@ecs.soton.ac.uk (Stevan Harnad) Please contrast this double-doomsday scenario ('self-archiving will not only destroy journals but all the other good works of learned societies') with the following quote from Dr Elizabeth Marincola, Executive Director of the American ... Open Access Archivangelism - http://openaccess.eprints.org/ |
| 20 Dec 2009 by nospam@example.com (Stevan Harnad) Yes, the interests of learned-society publishers like ACM -- and indeed those of any refereed journal publisher -- are not more important than the interests of research, researchers, their institutions, their funders, ... But research interests are not well-served if we demonize even those publishers, like ACM, who are already on the side of the angels on OA, nor if we gratuitously over-reach instead of grasping what's already within reach. .... Learned Societies ... Open Access Archivangelism - http://openaccess.eprints.org/ |
| 23 Oct 2007 by (Stevan Harnad) ACS is the Learned Society with the biggest and most remunerative publishing operation. With Chemical Abstracts they make a lot more money than the American Physical Society (APS), which was the very first of the Green publishers, and which set ... In this regard, AAAS (Green) is fully on the side of the Angels, whereas Nature (Pale-Green) is not. The only two differences between AAAS and Nature are that (1) AAAS is still (nominally) supporting the "Ingelfinger Rule" on ... Open Access Archivangelism - http://openaccess.eprints.org/ - References |
In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 7 already displayed.
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included.
Stay up to date on these results:
| Google Home - About Google Blog Search Beta - Information for Blog Authors |
